Abstract
The molecular phylogeny using mitochondrial DNA sequences provides valuable insights for wildlife conservation. However, the inference of phylogenies may be affected by the marker type as well as by the statistical model applied for data analysis. This study reports a comparative evaluation of neighbor-joining (NJ) and maximum-parsimony (MP) methods for phylogenetic inference among three Oryx species (Oryx leucoryx, Oryx dammah and Oryx gazella) as well as two closely related (same subfamily but different genera) outgroups including Addax and Roan, using 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. We observed that the 12S rRNA based phylogenetic inference is unable to differentiate between the genus Oryx and Addax, regardless of the method used. However, the 16S rRNA gene segment accurately grouped all the five taxa using MP but not the NJ suggesting the possible superiority of the former method for phylogenetic analysis using similar data structure. This report also describes a stepwise protocol that can easily be followed for constructing the trees using PHYLIP software.