Abstract
Glycerolipids form the largest fraction of all membrane lipids and their composition changes quickly during plant development, the diurnal cycle, and in response to hormones and biotic or abiotic stress. A challenge to accurate glycerolipid measurement is that lipid-degrading enzymes tend to remain active during extraction, and special care must be taken to ensure their inactivation. Multiple extraction methods have arisen to cope with this challenge but only a few comparative studies are available in the literature. Here we compare three commonly used methods for lipase inactivation and lipid extraction from two different plant tissues. The first method employs formic acid in an organic solvent for inactivation followed by immediate separation of the organic phase, while the second uses the same acidic solvent, but expands the time of lipase inactivation and lipid extraction by incubation at low temperature. The third method includes a boiling step of the tissue in isopropanol for enzyme inactivation. The first method is the fastest for lab conditions with few samples, the second and third are convenient with large sample numbers, including field work. The first two methods are commonly followed by lipid derivatization and gas chromatography, while the third avoids acids and is thus preferable for lipidomics approaches. We directly compare the methods on both Arabidopsis thaliana and Sorghum bicolor leaf tissues and measure the relative abundances of glycerolipid species formed by lipase activity. We conclude that each method provides intact lipid extracts of similar quality, if performed according to the protocols described below.