Abstract
Metamorphic testing uses domain-specific properties about a program's intended behaviour to alleviate the oracle problem. From a given set of source test in puts, a set of followup test inputs are generated which have some relation to the source inputs, and their outputs are compared to outputs from the source tests, using metamorphic relations. We evaluate the use of an automated test input generation technique called dynamic symbolic execution (DSE) to generate the source test inputs for metamorphic testing. We investigate whether DSE increases source-code coverage and fault finding effectiveness of metamorphic testing compared to the use of random testing, and whether the use of metamorphic relations as a supportive technique improves the test inputs generated by DSE. Our results show that DSE improves the coverage and fault detection rate of metamorphic testing compared to random testing using significantly smaller test suites, and the use of metamorphic relations increases code coverage of both DSE and random tests considerably, but the improvement in the fault detection rate may be marginal and depends on the used metamorphic relations.