Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effects of vital tooth bleaching with carbamide peroxide home bleaching and in-office bleaching on the color stability and 3D surface profile of dental restorative filling materials. Thirty discs (n = 30) measure 6mm in diameter and 2 mm thick for each of three restorative materials. These are nanofilled composite Filtek Z350 XT, the submicron composite Estelite Sigma Quick, and nanofilled glass ionomer Ketac N100 nanoionomer and were fabricated in shade A2. Each group was further divided into three subgroups (n = 10): subgroup A (Opalescence PF), subgroup B (Opalescence Boost in-office bleaching), and subgroup C (distilled water) serving as control. Samples were bleached according to the manufacturer's instructions for a period of two weeks. The Commission Internationale de L'Eclairage (CIEL* ,a* ,b*) system was chosen for image processing, while 3D surface profile was tested with atomic force microscopy (AFM). Statistical analyses were performed with the Mann-Whitney tests and Krusal-Wallis with a P value of <= 0.05. The three restorative materials showed significant color changes (Delta E); P <= 0.05. In diminishing order, the mean color changes recorded were Estelite Sigma (3.82 +/- 1.6) > Ketac Nano (2.97 +/- 1.2) > Filtek Z350 XT (2.25 +/- 1.0). However, none of the tested materials showed statistically significant changes in surface roughness; P > 0.05.