Abstract
Current decision support systems (DSS) research is overwhelmingly positivist and limits the adequate representation of relevant stakeholders. This crisis of relevance precludes the systemic inclusion of social and ethical issues in complex socio-technical DSS designs. For their unstable boundary conditions, such systems also require explicit coverage of their dynamics. Lending a novel perspective to DSS research, this paper proposes a framework with the new decision-making paradigm and the systemic inquiry of boundary critique to explore stakeholder perspectives for more ethically-aware DSS development. Using qualitative research, the developed framework is applied to unleash ethical issues for a dynamic and complex socio-technical university timetabling scenario implemented as a web-based group decision support system. Multiple stakeholder perspectives are recognised and analysed for boundary judgements, while a dynamic stakeholder network considers boundary liquidity and emergence. This work aims to couple systemic epistemology with the socio-technical lens to encourage the inclusion of ethical dimensions in dynamic and complex DSS designs.