Abstract
Introduction:
Comparative outcomes of hospitalizations for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) implantation procedures with and without coexisting Ischemic Heart Diseases (IHD) have not been studied at national level databases. We attempted to assess outcomes and baseline characteristics in these hospitalizations based on the National Inpatient Sample (NIS).
Hypothesis:
Ischemic heart disease worsens inpatient outcomes in patients undergoing CRT implantation.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective analysis of hospitalizations for CRT implantation from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) between 2013 and 2014. ICD-9 Billing codes were used to identify the target population. The primary outcomes were inpatient mortality, and hospital length and cost of stay.
Results:
A total of 11057 cases were identified. IHD was listed as any diagnosis in 66% of these hospitalizations. The mean age was 72.5 and 66.9 years for CRT implantation with and without IHD, respectively. Hospitalizations without IHD were more likely to be female (44% vs. 25%; p=0.01). Patients in the CRT with IHD group had a higher comorbidity burden with a higher proportion of hypertension, chronic kidney disease, anemia, peripheral artery disease, and congestive heart failure (Table 1). Inpatient mortality was similar between both groups (OR 1.17, CI 0.75-1.81). The IHD cohort had higher rates of cardiac arrest (OR 1.30, CI 1.05-1.62), acute kidney injury (OR 1.21, CI 1.08-1.35), longer length and a higher cost of stay (Table 1).
Conclusions:
IHD is associated with higher costs, longer length of stay, and higher rates of cardiac arrest. However, the in-hospital mortality was not different between the two groups. Higher incidence of cardiac arrest in patients with CRT and IHD underlines the importance of ICD with CRT. The clinical implication is that the threshold of selecting a CRT-D device in patients eligible for CRT therapy should be lower in patients with IHD vis-à-vis patients without IHD.