Abstract
OBJECTIVECommunication skills are the most important determinant of patients' satisfaction with care. Data about the adverse effects of cross-language encounters are scarce. This prospective study was designed to examine the association between the communication language and patients' satisfaction in oncology practice.PATIENTS AND METHODSThe Art of Medicine questionnaire was used to assess patients' perceptions of clinicians' communication behaviors and patients' global satisfaction. Mean scores of patients cared for by Arabic-speaking oncologists were compared with those of patients who had communications translated from English by interpreters.RESULTS255 patients were eligible. Patients' median age was 44 years (95% CI, 42.8-46.2). Communication was in Arabic and interpreted English for 136 (53%) and 119 (47%) patients, respectively. The two groups were comparable for various demographic and clinical variables. On a nine-point scale, mean scores for the eight questionnaire items ranged from 6.24 (95% CI, 5.91-6.56) to 8.24 (95% CI, 8.03-8.45). There was no significant difference in communication skills between Arabic- and English-speaking clinicians for any questionnaire item. Moreover, a multiple regression analysis failed to identify any variable that independently influenced overall patients' satisfaction with the delivered care.CONCLUSIONSThe findings do not support a disadvantageous effect on interpersonal skills and patients' satisfaction as a result of cross-language communication.