Abstract
The purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review to assess the utility of accelerometric methods to identify older adults at risk of falls.
The Preferred Reporting Item for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines were followed during all steps of this systematic review. Cross sectional and longitudinal studies assessing gait parameters in older adults using accelerometric devices, and comparing groups based on the risk of falls or fall history were identified from studies published in the MEDLINE, SCOPUS and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases between January 1996 and January 2017. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers. The quality of the methodology used in the studies included was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.
In total, 354 references were identified through the database search. After selection, ten studies were included in this systematic review. According to the cross sectional studies, people who fall or are at risk of fall are slower, and walk with shorter steps, lower step frequency, worse stride and step regularity in terms of time, position and acceleration profiles. One longitudinal study suggests considering harmonic ratio of upper trunk acceleration in the vertical plane. Two other longitudinal studies highlight the importance of considering more than one gait parameter, and sophisticated statistical tools to discern older adults at risk for future fall(s).
This systematic review essentially highlights the lack of available literature providing strong evidence that gait parameters obtained using acceleration-based methods could be useful to discern older people at risk of fall. Available literature is encouraging, but further high quality studies are needed to highlight the cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships between gait parameters and falls in older adults.