Abstract
The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of liver grafts procured from “marginal donors.” Among 62 liver transplants in 2002, almost half were harvested from donors who were not deemed acceptable by other transplant units. The authors compared the data concerning the donor's status with the function of the transplanted liver. The relations between individual parameters were estimated, as well as the differences between two groups of recipients: those who received a graft from the “poorer” donors versus those who received “better” grafts. Regardless of the relations between particular parameters a statistical analysis revealed that differences of liver function that were detected during the first 5 days after transplantation disappeared thereafter.