Abstract
Emergent phases at the interfaces in strongly correlated oxide heterostructures display novel properties not akin to those of constituting materials. The interfacial ferromagnetism in (LaMnO3)(m)/(SrMnO3)(n) (LMO)(m)/(SMO)(n) superlattices (SLs) with antiferromagnetic bulk LMO and SMO layers is believed to be a result of the interfacial charge transfer (CT). By using in situ optical ellipsometry, it is demonstrated directly that CT and emergent magnetism in (LMO)(m)/(SMO)(n) SLs are controlled by the LMO/SMO thickness ratio, chosen as m/n = 1 and 2. The enhanced CT in SLs with m/n = 2 favors the high-T-C emergent ferromagnetism with T-C = 350-360 K, whereas the reduced CT in m/n = 1 SLs suppresses it yielding T-C = 300 K. A complex dependence of the saturation magnetization as a function of interface density ? = (m + n)(-1) with minima at ? = 0.11 (m/n = 2) and ? = 0.25 (m/n = 1) was observed and rationalized by the competition of ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic contributions, originating from the volume of LMO and SMO layers as well as from the LMO/SMO interfaces. The role of epitaxy stress and MnO6 octahedral tilts in the emergent magnetic behavior is discussed.