Abstract
Purpose To present the differentiating clinical findings between intratarsal keratinous cyst (IKC) and chalazion. Method A retrospective review of medical records of all patients who presented between 2010 and 2018 at King Abdulaziz University Hospital with proven histopathological diagnosis of IKC was done. Complete ophthalmologic evaluation at presentation, surgical procedures performed, complications, histopathological findings, response to treatment and follow-up were recorded. Results Twelve patients were found to have IKC. All patients presented with an eyelid mass with no signs of local inflammation. All lesions were fixed to the tarsus with freely mobile overlying skin, which was found to be slightly pale compared to the surrounding skin in six patients. On palpation, IKC had well-defined boarders. Isolation with clear surgical plane for cyst excision was achieved in nine patients as they were superficially involving the tarsus. When IKC involved the deep part of the tarsus, bluish/ whitish nodules were seen upon eyelid eversion. Six patients were misdiagnosed and surgically treated as a chalazion elsewhere prior to presentation to us with recurrence. Conclusion Differentiating IKC from chalazion can be challenging. Careful clinical evaluation helps reaching the right diagnosis and providing the correct treatment, which involves complete excision of IKC to prevent recurrence.