Abstract
The impact of climate variability on wheat crops has been estimated using classical and neutrosophic approaches. Temperature and rain have been incorporated as the indicators of climate variability during wheat growth phenology and taking wheat yield as a dependent variable. A comparative analysis of estimated results under the classical approach with the neutrosophic approach has been performed. The results revealed that rising temperature is stressing the wheat yield. The second stage of the wheat crop is the most vulnerable growth stage which is more susceptible to temperature than rain. Further, the neutrosophic estimation seems more reliable and elaborates additional dimensions of analysis in which the classical approach is incapable.