Abstract
A prerequisite to evolving the concept of computerized assessment method requires a comparable test scores data based on the comparative study scores of both paper-based test (PBT) and computer-based test (CBT) methods. Previous research studies reported that even though both testing types show significant commonalities in many areas of technical and academic concerns, still there are substantial variances found in test scores. Consequently, in various educational assessment systems this significant inconsistency raises serious question on the rationale of substituting PBT with CBT. This is imperative to compare the both testing modes and to provide a concrete base for this replacement. This research study was aimed at implementing an achievement test and a motivation level checking questionnaire in order to test the effectiveness and validity of the CBT and to measure the level of student motivation that directly controls the performance and results. Researcher aims to get some valid data to provide a solid base fo the effective use of CBT in academic and placement modes. Results showed that (a) the pretests improved the results by providing experience for the tests themselves (b) participants in CBT group showed better test performance. In fact. CBT is known to be an efficient tool for assessment.