Abstract
Objectives
This study aimed to compare the results of a software calculation method (SCM) and the mathematical calculation method (MCM) in measuring the cross-sectional area (CSA) at four different upper airway segments.
Methods
The data from the retrospective chart reviews of patients older than 18 years who had undergone computed tomography (CT) of the neck at our tertiary care center between September 2014 and September 2018 were reviewed. Data of patients who were intubated, tracheostomized, had nasogastric tubes, tumors, craniofacial anomalies, trauma, or any pathology that may affect the normal airway anatomy were excluded. We measured the anteroposterior (APD) and transverse diameter (TD) utilizing the CT software. CSA was calculated using both the mathematical formula (MCM) and software (SCM) at the glottis, proximal subglottis, distal subglottis, and tracheal levels. A paired sample t-test was used to determine the significant difference between SCM and MCM at each level.
Results
The data of 100 patients (59% female) were reviewed. There was a significant difference between the SCM and MCM at all four levels. The mean differences between the SCM and MCM were -33.63 mm
2
, -24.20 mm
2
, 6.04 mm
2
(p < 0.001) at the glottis, proximal subglottis, and trachea, respectively. The mean difference at the distal subglottis was -4.08 mm
2
(p = 0.01).
Conclusion
Our study found a significant difference between the SCM and MCM in measuring the CSA of the four airway segments. Theoretically, the SCM is more accurate and precise than MCM in measuring CSA; however, we could not prove the superiority of either method.