Abstract
Decision-makers' subjective preferences can be well modeled using preference aggregation operators and related induced weights allocation mechanisms. However, when several different types of preferences occur in some decision environment with more complex uncertainties, repeated uses of preferences induced weights allocation sometimes become unsuitable or less reasonable. In this work, we discuss a common decision environment where several invited experts will offer their respective evaluation values for a certain object. There are three types of preferences which will significantly affect the weights allocations from experts. Instead of unsuitably performing preference induced weights allocation three times independently and then merging the results together using convex combination as some literatures recently did, in this work, we propose some organic and comprehensive rules-based screen method to first rule out some unqualified experts and then take preference induced weights allocation for the refined group of experts. A numerical example in business management and decision-making is presented to show the cognitive reasonability and practical feasibility.