Abstract
Screening for congenital hypothyroidism (CH) using cord blood or heel-stick samples is considered essential for the prevention of long-term complications CH, which include intellectual disability and slow growth.
Compare the sensitivity and specificity of cord blood and heel-stick samples for determining thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) levels for the detection of CH.
Comparative diagnostic accuracy.
Tertiary care center in Riyadh.
The study included all infants who were delivered during the period from May 2011 to May 2013. As part of routine newborn screening, both cord blood and heel-stick samples were collected from each newborn for CH screening by measuring TSH levels. A cord TSH level was considered positive if the concentration of TSH was more than 60 mIU/L and negative if less than 30 mIU/L. Any cord TSH level between 30-60 mIU/L was considered borderline, and free T4 was measured from the same cord sample. The result was considered positive if the free T4 level was below 9 pmol/L. Heel-stick TSH levels more than 20 µU/L were considered positive. All newborns with positive results were recalled and a peripheral venous sample was taken for TSH and free T4 for confirmation.
Sensitivity and specificity, positive and negative predictive values and recall rates.
17 729 screened babies.
Of 17 729 neonates screened, 7 were diagnosed as having primary CH. All confirmed cases were detected by both cord and heel-stick TSH levels: 88 cord results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 99.6%, with a recall rate of 0.04%) and 305 heel-stick results were positive (sensitivity 100%, specificity 98.3%, with a recall rate of 1.68%).
Both cord and heel-stick TSH testing detected all cases of CH. Cord testing was superior to heel-stick testing as the recall rate was lower. We think cord TSH testing is preferable when heel-stick is difficult or early discharge is the practice.
Retrospective; the timing of newborn screening for TSH sampling was premature.
None.