Abstract
Language is indispensible to every political action as it is structured, transferred and swayed through language (Sharndama, 2015). The use of language at public forums by a personality is called public speech. It is one of the vital tools politicians use to incorporate their ideologies in the minds of masses. The relationship between language and politics extends back to Greek and Roman treaties on rhetoric. Rhetoric is an art of delivering ideas in public. According to Aristotle the key to statesmanship is the skill of rhetoric (L.Dunmire, 2012). Cicero also viewed rhetoric as an apparatus to shape political beliefs and actions. The current study is a CDA analysis of Mr. Nawaz Shrief and Mr Imran Khan's speeches after a verdict upon Panama case and the analysis manifests the fact that Imran Khan's speech is more inclined towards playing an educative role for masses. This legacy of classical rhetoric manifests itself in "modern world's Public Political Communication"(PPC) in much more deliberate and refined way. Hence, in order to comprehend modern rhetoric we must consider public political communication as major social and political fact with an essential contribution in establishing social order (Arsith, 2015).