Abstract
Macroenzymes may cause elevations in serum enzyme activity. Macroenzymes are not common; however their detection is important because they cause diagnostic confusion and therapeutic errors.
We analyzed 2 of the most prevalent macroenzymes in the literature, macro-creatine kinase (macro-CK) and macroamylase, using 2 methods for detection, polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation and ultrafiltration (UF). Enzyme measurements were made using a Roche Modular Analytics P analyzer. Imprecision was assessed using quality control material. We evaluated 125 samples from apparently healthy subjects to establish reference intervals. For macro-CK comparison, 94 samples with activities>200U/l were analyzed with both PEG precipitation and UF and compared to electrophoresis. PEG precipitation and UF were compared for macroamylase detection using 130 samples with amylase activities>110U/l.
UF was more precise and demonstrated narrower reference intervals for both analytes. PEG precipitation and UF were able to detect true cases of macro-CK with overall agreement with electrophoresis of 79.8% and 80.9%, respectively. Both methods detected the same number of ‘positive’ macroamylase samples; however PEG precipitation resulted in a greater number of ‘indeterminate’ cases.
This is the first report where UF has been shown useful for the detection of both macro-CK and macroamylase.