Abstract
Objective
FNAC has a definitive role and has proved extremely useful in diagnosis of testicular and paratesticular mass lesions. In view of the dearth of literature of studies involving large cohorts of patients, the present study describes at length the detailed cytological evaluation of testicular and paratesticular mass lesions.
Methods
Our study consisted of 85 cases in 5‐year retrospective and 1‐year prospective analyses carried out in the Department of Pathology, Government Medical College, Jammu. The study depicts cytomorphological findings of testicular and paratesticular mass lesions. We evaluate the concordance rate of cytological diagnosis with the histological diagnosis as a percentage and assess the diagnostic accuracy of FNAC by calculating sensitivity and specificity.
Results
Out of 85 cases, inflammatory lesions comprised the largest group comprising 47 cases (55.29%) followed by 20 cases (23.5%) of cystic lesions. In addition, there were 10 cases (11.76%) of malignant tumours and three cases (3.5%) of benign tumours. Overall, acute orchitis was the most common inflammatory lesions (12.94%) followed by tubercular epididymitis (9.4%). The most common cystic lesion was benign epididymal cyst (10.5%) and the most common malignant tumours were seminoma and embryonal carcinoma. Cytohistological correlation was available for 16 (18.82%) cases only and cytological diagnosis was concordant with the histological diagnosis in all these cases. Sensitivity and specificity of FNAC was 100% in our study.
Conclusion
FNAC is a useful diagnostic modality for testicular and paratesticular mass lesions due to its high sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between different types of lesions and high concordance rates with histopathological diagnosis.
FNAC is a useful diagnostic modality for testicular and paratesticular mass lesions due to its high sensitivity and specificity in discriminating between different types of lesions and high concordance rates with histopathological diagnosis.