Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is one of the most technically demanding and high-risk procedures performed by GI endoscopists. Therefore, guidelines or position statements on various aspects of quality indicators, safety indicators and credentialing for ERCP have been developed by gastroenterology associations. In this paper, we evaluate the ERCP quality in a single, high-volume, tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia using a number of measures commonly stated by these organizations, and compare the experience of that center to the previously-published standards in this regard.
This is a descriptive, retrospective chart review of a consecutive sample taken over 12 continuous months (July 2016-June 2017). Data collected included demographic characteristics, and technical/clinical details from three time periods: preprocedure, intraprocedure, and postprocedure. Measurement parameters were all taken from the ASGE/ACG guidelines. Data was represented by the percentage of which each indicator was achieved, and the 95% proportion confidence intervals (CIs) when needed.
From July 2016 to June 2017, 281 ERCP procedures were performed. An outstanding majority of them (95.7%) was done for therapeutic purposes, whereas 4.3% were diagnostic procedures. The sample included 206 patients, of whom 83 (40.3%) were males. The age of the participants ranged between 11 and 101 years (mean age ± SD; 51 ± 19). The quality of ERCP at the center in which the study was done met the performance targets stated by the ASGE/ACG for almost all indicators. Adverse events reported in our series were lower than previous studies for pancreatitis and perforation, and slightly higher in the incidence of bleeding, cholangitis, and death.
In a single, high-volume, tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia, the quality of ERCP met the performance targets stated by the ASGE/ACG for almost all indicators.