Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the available evidence regarding the effect of apical patency versus nonpatency on postendodontic pain in adult patients.
The study adhered strictly to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE via Ovid, Google Scholar, and the Web of Science databases were searched up to April 2018 to retrieve the most relevant studies. Two authors evaluated the studies for eligibility criteria and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane tool. The weighted means were calculated using a fixed effects model. When statistically significant (P < .1) heterogeneity was detected, a random effects model was used to assess the significance of treatment effects.
Five studies were identified for this systematic review; 4 were included in the meta-analyses. Two studies revealed a low risk of bias, whereas 3 studies revealed a high risk of bias. Because of the significant heterogeneity between studies, a random effects model was used. The meta-analysis showed that the apical patency resulted in less postoperative pain compared with nonpatency, but the difference was not statistically significant. Moreover, no statistically significant difference was found with regard to analgesic consumption.
Considering the limitations of this study, it was concluded that maintaining apical patency during routine endodontic treatment was not associated with an increased incidence of postoperative pain in adult patients.