Abstract
Objectives. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of super floss and water flosser in plaque removal for patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Methods. A single-blind, randomized, controlled, parallel clinical trial with a split-mouth protocol was conducted on young adult orthodontic patients who were recruited from Riyadh Specialized Dental Center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. The type of floss used was randomly assigned to each side of the oral cavity; Super-Floss (R)(Oral-B) was used on one side, while the Waterpik (R) water flosser was used on the other. Patients' plaque level was assessed using Rustogi et al. modified navy plaque index (RMNPI) at baseline and immediately after cleaning. Results. A total of 62 subjects were screened; however, only 34 subjects were enrolled in the study with an equal number of males and females. Overall, the plaque score was significantly reduced from 0.56 +/- 0.35 to 0.13 +/- 0.26 in the super floss group and from 0.61 +/- 0.35 to 0.13 +/- 0.28 in the water flosser group. There was no significant difference between the mean difference of super floss and water flosser (p = 0.951). On the other hand, there was no significant difference between both groups in terms of the preintervention plaque score (p = 0.379). The water flosser had a greater effect size on plaque removal compared to super floss on distal interproximal surface of the molar tooth with a mean difference of (-0.21, 95% CI: 00.37 to -0.04, p = 0.033). Conclusions. The use of super floss or water flosser as interproximal aids for plaque removal in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment are both effective.