Abstract
BACKGROUND: Otosclerosis is a common cause of progressive hearing impairment that causes fixation of the stapes. Surgical intervention is the preferred treatment approach to ameliorate the conductive hearing loss associated with stapedial otosclerosis. However, given that it is a difficult and delicate procedure, the surgery may fail for a number of reasons. Therefore, it is very important to evaluate the success rate of the surgical approach used in each regional center.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of stapedotomy in improving hearing sensitivity for otosclerotic patients at King Abdul Aziz University Hospital in Riyadh.
DESIGN: Retrospective chart review with an analysis of pre- and postoperative surgical treatment.
SETTING: Tertiary referral otolaryngology clinic.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: All cases who underwent stapedotomy between 1997 and 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Preoperative and postoperative audiometric assessments were conducted using conventional pure tone audiometry. Differences were analyzed by two-way repeated measures ANOVA.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Pre- and postoperative pure tone thresholds for air and bone conduction.
RESULT: Fifty-three patients underwent stapedotomy. Stapedotomy yielded significant improvements in mean (SD) postoperative air-conduction thresholds of about 18.7 (11.7) dB (P<.0001) and mean (SD) postoperative bone-conduction thresholds of about 2 (7.2) dB (P<.05). Additionally, a significant correlation was found between improvement in air-conduction thresholds and the size of preoperatve air-bone gap (P<.01) About 70% of patients achieved an air-bone gap of 20 dB or better. None of the cases examined in this study exhibited sensorineural hearing loss or adverse complications following stapedotomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Stapedotomy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with otosclerosis. Given that the majority of participants in this study exhibited mixed hearing loss preoperatively, the results further suggest that stapedotomy can also be effective in improving thresholds for these patients.
LIMITATIONS: The sample size was relatively small.