Abstract
To systematically and meta‐analytically pool evidence from randomized placebo‐controlled trials that examined the efficacy and safety of topical clascoterone cream in patients with acne vulgaris. Four databases were screened from inception to 10 October 2020. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias. Efficacy outcomes included investigator's global assessment (IGA) treatment success and absolute change in inflammatory lesion counts (ILCs) and noninflammatory lesion counts (NILCs). Safety outcomes included the proportion of patients with any treatment‐emergent adverse event (TEAE) as well as incidence of any TEAE, serious adverse events (AEs), AEs related to study drug, AEs leading to study drug discontinuation, nasopharyngitis, headache, oropharyngeal pain, and vomiting. Dichotomous data were analyzed using the risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) whereas continuous data were analyzed using the mean difference (MD) and 95% CI. Review Manager Software version 5.4.1 was used for statistical analysis. Five clinical trials, comprising 2457 patients (1357 and 1100 patients received clascoterone and placebo, respectively) were included. Studies revealed an overall low risk of bias. Clascoterone significantly increased IGA success rates (RR = 2.87, 95% CI [2.11, 3.89], P < .001) and decreased NILCs (MD = −5.64, 95% CI [−8.41, −2.87], P < .01) without substantially impacting the ILCs (MD = −1.82, 95% CI [−5.06, 1.43], P = .27). No significant differences were noted between both groups for all safety outcomes, except for nasopharyngitis which was significantly lower in the clascoterone group (RR = 0.47, 95% CI [0.27, 0.83], P = .01). Topical clascorterone cream is safe and effective in the treatment of acne vulgaris.