Abstract
To investigate the impact of parameter optimisation for novel three-dimensional 3D sequences at 1.5T and 3T on resultant image quality.
Following institutional review board approval and acquisition of informed consent, MR phantom and knee joint imaging on healthy volunteers (n = 16) was performed with 1.5 and 3T MRI scanners, respectively incorporating 8- and 15-channel phased array knee radiofrequency coils. The MR phantom and healthy volunteers were prospectively scanned over a six-week period. Acquired sequences included standard two-dimensional (2D) turbo spin echo (TSE) and novel three-dimensional (3D) TSE PDW (SPACE) both with and without fat-suppression, and T2∗W gradient echo (TrueFISP) sequences. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were measured for knee anatomical structures. Two musculoskeletal radiologists evaluated anatomical structure visualisation and image quality. Quantitative and qualitative findings were investigated for differences using Friedman tests. Inter- and intra-observer agreements were determined with κ statistics.
Phantom and healthy volunteer images revealed higher SNR for sequences acquired at 3T (p-value <0.05). Generally, the qualitative findings ranked images acquired at 3T higher than corresponding images acquired at 1.5T (p < 0.05). 3D image data sets demonstrated less sensitivity to partial volume averaging artefact (PVA) compared to 2D sequences. Inter- and intra-observer agreements for evaluation across all sequences ranged from 0.61 to 0.79 and 0.71 to 0.92, respectively.
Both 2D and 3D images demonstrated higher image quality at 3T than at 1.5T. Optimised 3D sequences performed better than the standard 2D PDW TSE sequence for contrast resolution between cartilage and joint fluid, with reduced PVA artefact.
With rapid advances in MRI scanner technology, including hardware and software, the optimisation of 3D MR pulse sequences to reduce scan time while maintaining image quality, will improve diagnostic accuracy and patient management in musculoskeletal MRI.
•The 3D images acquired at 3T demonstrated better image quality than at 1.5T.•3D TrueFISP and 3D PDW SPACE-FS provide excellent contrast between cartilage and joint fluid.•3D sequences provide better visualisation for small anatomical structures within the knee joint.