Abstract
Isolation followed by morphological identification was the traditional basis of all earlier endophyte studies. However, the use of molecular phylogenetics has become increasingly common in the identification of fungal endophytes, and during the period of 2007-2010 there were approximately 200 publications that reported data obtained using this approach. This new methodology involves using sequence data from isolates or whole DNA from plant substrates, which are amplified using fungus- specific primers. The data obtained are compared with sequences downloaded from public databases such as GenBank and then used to construct phylogenetic trees. The major problem with this approach is that much of the sequence data in these databases has been shown to be from isolates that were incorrectly named. In some species, as much as 86% of the sequences available are not from the organism whose name has been applied to the sequence in question. The use of these GenBank sequences to identify endophytic isolates by sequence similarity simply perpetuates the problem of wrong species identification, and any lists of endophytes established by such methods are likely to be highly erroneous. It is recommended that comparisons of sequence data be made using sequences from type species, and if such sequences are not available, then the data must be treated with caution.