Abstract
The idea of bipolar complex fuzzy (BCF) sets, as a genuine modification of both bipolar fuzzy sets and complex fuzzy sets, gives a massive valuable framework for representing and evaluating ambiguous information. In intelligence decision making based on BCF sets, it is a critical dilemma to compare or rank positive and negative membership grades. In this framework, we deliberated various techniques for aggregating the collection of information into a singleton set, called BCF weighted arithmetic averaging (BCFWAA), BCF ordered weighted arithmetic averaging (BCFOWAA), BCF weighted geometric averaging (BCFWGA), and BCF ordered weighted geometric averaging (BCFOWGA) operators for BCF numbers (BCFNs). To illustrate the feasibility and original worth of the diagnosed approaches, we demonstrated various properties of the diagnosed operators, in addition to their capability that the evaluated value of a set of BCF numbers is a unique BCF number. Further, multiattribute decision making (“MADM”) refers to a technique employed to compute a brief and dominant assessment of opinions with multiattributes. The main influence of this theory is implementing the diagnosed theory in the field of the MADM tool using BCF settings. Finally, a benchmark dilemma is used for comparison with various prevailing techniques to justify the cogency and dominancy of the evaluated operators.