Abstract
Diethyl ether (DEE) and its isomer n-butanol are both considered as promising fuel additives or neat bio-fuels. While some effects of their addition to hydrocarbon fuels under engine conditions have been reported, fundamental studies that aim at understanding the joint reaction pathways of such fuel mixtures remain quite scarce. Here, we have chosen n-butane as a well-studied hydrocarbon base fuel, and we have added these oxygenated isomers individually under identical conditions in premixed low-pressure flames. Different combustion behavior of the respective alkane-biofuel mixtures must then be related to the fuel structure. Analyses were performed in five fuel-rich flames including flames of n-butane, DEE, and n-butanol as well as two flames of n-butane doped with 50% DEE or 50% n-butanol. In this series, the carbon-to-oxygen ratio, argon dilution, pressure, and gas velocity were kept constant More than 40 species in the range of C-0-C-8 were identified and quantified in each flame by electron ionization (El) molecular-beam mass spectrometry (MBMS) coupled with gas chromatography (GC). The experiments were partially complemented by tunable synchrotron vacuum ultraviolet (SVUV) photoionization (PI)MBMS. To assist in the interpretation of the data, a kinetic model was established by combining different sub-mechanisms for these fuels available in the literature. As expected, the formation of toxic carbonyls, such as formaldehyde and acetaldehyde, increased significantly upon addition of both oxygenated fuels to n-butane. Blending n-butane with DEE noticeably reduces the formation of soot precursors, because primary reactions of DEE mainly release C-1-C-2 hydrocarbon species to the system. n-Butanol addition, however, shows no significant reduction effects or even higher formation of soot precursors. These trends were observed both in the experiments and model predictions, and the higher ability of n-butanol to form soot precursors compared to DEE indeed results mainly from the differences in the fuel structure. (C) 2016 The Combustion Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.