Abstract
LIP printing is a term adapted from forensic science to describe the use of geochemical proxies for tectonic and petrogenetic fingerprinting of Large Igneous Provinces (LIPs). Here, we investigate in detail the LIP printing of basic lavas, sills and dykes using two immobile element proxies: Th/Nb, a crustal input proxy, to monitor subduction-metasomatism and crustal assimilation and Ti/Yb, a residual garnet proxy, to monitor depth and degree of melting. The LIP printing diagram, a plot of Th/Nb against Ti/Yb for intraplate, plume-derived magmas, is characterised by two distinct arrays: a subduction-modified lithospheric mantle (SZLM) array and a MORB-OIB-OPB (plume) array (where OPB = oceanic plateau basalt). LIP basalt suites divide into three categories on this diagram: Type I plots entirely within the MORB-OIB-OPB array indicative of a significant plume source; Type II plots entirely within the SZLM array indicative of a significant sub-continental lithospheric mantle source, and Type III plots on a variety of trends between the two arrays indicative of significant plume-lithosphere interactions. Modelling demonstrates how the three LIP types, and the observed trends within and between individual LIPs, can be explained by differences in the compositions and relative contributions of lithospheric and asthenospheric (plume) mantle, in temperature and depth of melting and in the extent and nature of magma-crust interactions. This large genetic, and hence compositional, variability within and between LIPs relates to differences in geological and geodynamic setting and supports the forensic concept that ‘no two LIP prints are alike’. The potential applications of the LIP printing diagram are demonstrated here using four types of examples that highlight temporal and spatial LIP print diversity: flood basalt terranes related to Atlantic breakup (NAIP, Parana-Etendeka and CAMP); giant dyke swarms (Superior Craton Late Archean to Early Proterozoic dyke swarms and the Mackenzie dyke swarm); mineralization-related LIP terranes (Bushveld and Noril’sk); and early (c. 3.5 Ga) Earth and extraterrestrial lavas (terrrestrial Paleoarchean basalts and komatiites, lunar mare basalts and Martian shergottites).
•Geochemically, no two large igneous provinces (LIPs) are the same.•LIPs may be distinguished using the LIP printing diagram (Th/Nb v Ti/Yb).•The diagram highlights plume and lithosphere sources and their interactions.•LIP compositions can change systematically in time and space.•Applications extend to distinguishing suites of extraterrestrial lavas.