Abstract
Two wettable powder formulations (Bactimos and Vectobac) and a flowable concentrate (Teknar) formulation of
Bacillus thuringiensis serovar.
israelensis were evaluated as larvicides of
Culex pipiens, Aedes caspius, and
Aedes detritus. In the laboratory, the levels of susceptibility of these species to the test formulations were essentially similar and corresponded to their relative potencies; the LC
90 values ranged from 0.042 to 0.37 ppm.
C. pipiens, A. caspius, and
A. detritus, in that order, were susceptible to the biocide. Under field conditions in central Italy. Bactimos at 0.5 kg/ha gave 98% control of
C. pipiens in an irrigation canal. Teknar at 1.25 liters/ha gave 86–100%, and at 2.5 liters/ha gave 90–100% control of
C. pipiens in two natural ponds. Against
A. caspius in salt marsh habitats, Bactimos at 0.5 kg/ha and Teknar at 2.5 liters/ha yielded complete control of the larvae, while a lower rate (0.2 kg/ha) of Bactimos, and Vectobac at 0.5 kg/ha resulted in 82–94% and 67–91% control, respectively. Higher rates (0.75 and 1.0 kg/ha) of Vectobac gave 76–100% and 98–100% control of
A. caspius. Bactimos at 0.15 kg/ha gave 93–98% control of
A. detritus in two salt marsh ponds.
B. thuringiensis serovar.
israelensis is practically economical for the control of
C. pipiens, A. caspius, and
A. detritus in the various biotopes in central Italy.