Abstract
Among the numerous alternatives used in the world of risk balance, it highlights the provision of guarantees in the formalization of credit agreements. The objective of this paper is to compare the achievement of fuzzy sets with that of artificial neural network-based decision trees on credit scoring to predict the recovered value using a sample of 1890 borrowers. Comparing with fuzzy logic, the decision analytic approach can more easily present the outcomes of the analysis. On the other hand, fuzzy logic makes some implicit assumptions that may make it even harder for credit-grantors to follow the logical decision-making process. This paper leads an initial study of collateral as a variable in the calculation of the credit scoring. The study concludes that the two models make modelling of uncertainty in the credit scoring process possible. Although more difficult to implement, fuzzy logic is more accurate for modelling the uncertainty. However, the decision tree model is more favourable to the presentation of the problem.