Abstract
Background
A wide array of diseases can lead to skin defects of the male genitalia. Although reconstructive options have been debated in the literature, no study has compared the effectiveness of a meshed split-thickness skin graft (STSG) and a sheet STSG in perineal and scrotal wound coverage. In this study, we report our experience in a tertiary trauma center.
Methodology
In this retrospective study, we included cases with a skin defect of the male genitalia, for which genital reconstruction with a skin graft was performed at our hospital from December 2017 to February 2020. This study was approved by the institutional review board. The analysis was performed at 95% confidence interval using the Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS) version 23.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
Results
A total of 27 patients were included in the study. The most common indication for genital reconstruction was Fournier’s gangrene (59.3%). In 15 (55.6%) patients, a meshed skin graft was utilized to cover the defect, whereas a sheet graft was utilized in 12 (44.4%) patients. Out of the 15 patients who underwent genital reconstruction with a meshed graft, 10 (66.6%) had complete graft take. On the other hand, out of the 12 (44.4%) patients who underwent genital reconstruction using a sheet graft, five (41.6%) had complete graft take. A statistically significant relationship was found between aesthetic and functional outcomes and the type of skin graft used. The satisfaction rate was higher among meshed skin graft recipients (86.2%) compared to sheet skin graft recipients (41.7%) (p = 0.014).
Conclusions
Based on our observational experience, we found that meshed STSG to cover male genital skin defects is safe with satisfactory cosmetic outcomes. Further prospective randomized studies are needed.