Abstract
Green Manganese Ferrite (GMF) and Chemical mediated Manganese Ferrite (CMF) were designed and prepared via in situ co-precipitation method and their adsorption potential was compared using the model dye, Metanil Yellow (MY). Previously, an extract of aquatic macrophyte and metal chloride were employed for the development of ecofriendly GMF. Alternatively, CMF has been synthesized through chemical co-precipitation from metal chloride precursors. Several characterization methods, including PSA, BET, TGA, DSC, FTIR, SEM, VSM, EDX, and XRD, were analyzed to reveal the structural and functional properties of the as-synthesized GMF and CMF. Their MY adsorption performances were tested as the function of the operational conditions such as initial solution pH, temperature, nanocomposite dosage, and dye concentration in a batch mode of operation. The pseudo-second order MY adsorption process fits best in Langmuir model which yielded the maximal monolayer adsorption capacity (qmax) of 391.34 mg/g for GMF and 271.89 mg/g for CMF. This outperformance of GMF over CMF was observed due to the augmentation of specified surface functional moieties derived from the phyto-constituents of macrophages. Further, the thermodynamic studies confirmed the chemisorptive and exothermic nature of adsorption processes. Conclusively, with the ease of regeneration and reuse potential, GMF and CMF could be viable contenders for scale up and industrial applications.
•Employment of natural and biocompatible material and green synthesis.•Green manganese ferrite (GMF) versus chemically mediated manganese ferrite profile comparison (CMF).•The structural and functional properties were analyzed by PSA, BET, TGA, DSC, FTIR, SEM, VSM, EDX, and XRD.•Monolayer adsorption of GMF and CMF was 391.34 mg/g and 271.89 mg/g, respectively.