Abstract
Introduction: Inguinal herniotomy in children is still dominated by conventional open inguinal herniotomy (COIH) as laparoscopic techniques have yet to demonstrate clear advantages. A technical modification that minimizes the incision of COIH in selected children can offer another minimally invasive alternative. A comparative analysis of safety, efficacy, and parental attitudes between mini-scar inguinal herniotomy (MSIH) and COIH was performed.
Materials and Methods: All inguinal herniotomy cases performed between January 2008 and April 2010 were reviewed. Patients who were younger than 6 months, presented with complicated hernias, or had an associated hydrocele were excluded. In the MSIH group the final scar length was prospectively measured and then retrospectively compared with a matched group of COIH. Parents in both groups were then interviewed using a standardized questionnaire to inquire about operative outcomes, their satisfaction level, and perception of the incision size.
Results: Of the 145 patients identified, 113 (79%) had completed the parental phone interview at a mean interval of 275 +/- 212 days. Forty (35%) underwent MSIH with a mean final incision length of 7.7 +/- 2 mm, and 73 (65%) underwent COIH. The two groups were similar in age, sex, and hernias' sides. Postoperative complication including recurrence rates did not differ between MSIH and COIH (2.5% versus 6.8%, P = .4). However, parents in the MSIH group were more likely to notice that the scar was smaller than what they have expected (odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-11.9) and were more likely to be very satisfied (odds ratio, 10.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-38).
Conclusion: The safety and efficacy of MSTH are comparable to those of COIH. However, in the MSIH group, parents are more likely to notice the smaller scar, which might improve their satisfaction.