Abstract
Randomized response techniques (RRTs) have been proposed in survey sampling literature as a solution to the problem of social desirability bias (SDB) while dealing with sensitive questions. All RRTs reduce the SDB by introducing privacy protection for the respondents, but the variances of the estimates become larger compared with the ones obtained from direct questioning technique (DQT). The success of RRTs heavily depends on the assumption that the variable of interest is in fact sensitive for the population under study. There might be situations, however, where a presumably sensitive question is not considered to be sensitive in some populations, in which case using an RRT instead of the DQT would inflate the variance of the estimates unreasonably. In this study, we propose a two-stage sampling procedure for a binary response, which enables one to accurately estimate both the prevalence of the sensitive characteristic and the probability of cheating in a population. The proposed model allows one to choose between an RRT and the DQT. We support our theoretical results with numerous simulations.