Abstract
The aim of the current study was to improve the selection method of camel oocytes after in vitro maturation by reducing exclusion criteria that were based only on the presence of the first polar body. A combined nuclear and morphometric assessment of camel oocytes after in vitro maturation was included to perform a judgment. The nuclear status of the oocytes, including the presence of the first polar body, meiosis I stage, and lack of nuclear materials, was investigated. The morphometric criteria that comprised the dimensions of each oocyte were as follows: diameter of the whole oocyte, including the zona pellucida (ZPO), zona pellucida thickness (ZPT), ooplasm diameter (OD), the perivitelline space (PVS) area, and PVS diameter. Among the oocytes with different nuclear status, there were no differences in ZPO and ZPT. However, oocytes with no nuclear material showed a significant reduction in OD (110.19 +/- 1.4 mu m) and a significant increase in PVS area (2139 +/- 324.6 mu m(2)) and PVS diameter (13.9 +/- 1.96 mu m) when compared with oocytes in the meiosis I stage (117.41 +/- 2.85 mu m, 1287.4 +/- 123.4 mu m(2), and 8.56 +/- 0.65 mu m, respectively). To simplify the selection, the major difference between meiosis I and degenerated oocytes was the diameter of the PVS, which was greater than the ZPT in degenerated oocytes. Therefore, three groups were morphologically differentiated into oocytes with polar bodies (PB1), meiosis I (MI) oocytes, and degenerated oocytes. MI oocytes were able to extrude the polar body after activation but were not able to develop into blastocysts. In contrast, MI oocytes were able to develop into blastocysts after a biphasic activation protocol in which the oocytes were electrically activated and treated with ionomycin after 2 h. In conclusion, the results obtained by the morphometric assessment allowed us to develop a simple and objective classification system for in vitro matured dromedary camel oocytes, which will lead to accurate oocyte selection for the support of subsequent embryonic development. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.