Abstract
It is well-known that the Kummer quadratic transformation formula is valid provided that its parameters fulfill some specific conditions (see Gradshteyn, Ryzhik, Tables of Integrals, Series and Products, 9.130, 9.134.1). Very recently, one of us established a new identity when one of these conditions is not fulfilled. In this paper, we aim to discuss another isolated case which completely different from the first. Moreover, in the end, we mention two interesting consequences of these two new results.