Abstract
This study aims to investigate the strategies and modifications employed by the Complaint Unit Representatives (CURs) in response to complaints recorded in the formal workplace of a medical institution in the Saudi Ministry of Health (MOH). A pragmatic discourse analytic approach was adopted to construct an analytical framework for authentic spoken complaint responses in the Saudi medical institution context. The data were randomly collected from 80 recorded phone conversations between patients and the CURs. It was transcribed verbatim, imported into MAXQDA for qualitative analysis of codes categorizations, and then into SPSS for statistical analysis. The findings showed that the staff employed a balance of transactional and interpersonal approaches in their response strategies, which varied in both quantity and quality depending on the phase or the major sequence of the moves made in the complaint call. Specifically, more transactional strategies were used during the main portion of a complaint and in the medial phase, while more interpersonal strategies were employed during the initial and the final phases of the call. The findings also showed that the CURs tended to downgrade and mitigate their responses to patients' complaints, and they never used upgraders. The influence of the religious culture was also noticeable in their use of downgraders, including optimistic devices and religious expressions. These findings reveal practical implications that can aid the quality team of the Complaint Unit (CU) in assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of the CURs' response strategies when handling complaints, and in providing more effective communication training as needed.