Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the nature of the relationship between personality profile traits (emotional balance, responsibility, social, control) and aggression among Hafr Al-Batin University students, as well as to determine if there are statistically significant differences between personality profile traits of university students, as well as to determine if there are statistically significant differences between personality profile traits and aggression according to t The researcher chose a random sample of 120 female students and used the Gordon Allport Personal Profile Scale and the aggression Scale developed by Iman Jamal Al-Din. To suit the nature of the study and the data, the researcher employed a descriptive, correlative, and comparative technique. The investigation yielded the following findings:
1- There is a statistically significant adverse association between the personality profile characteristic (emotional balance) and aggression.
2- A statistically significant adverse relationship exists between the personality characteristic (responsibility) and aggression.
3- A direct, statistically significant relationship exists between the personality attribute (social) and aggression.
4- A statistically significant inverse relationship exists between the personality attribute (control) and aggression.
5- There are statistically significant disparities in the personality profile features of female community college students in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia's University of Hafr Al-Batin.
6- There are no statistically significant differences between the traits of the personality profile regarding the trait of social responsibility, responsibility and aggression due to the academic level variable, while there are statistically significant differences in the trait of control, emotional balance and the trait of the personality profile due to the academic level and these differences are in favor of the fourth level.