Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this split-mouth, randomized, prospective clinical trial was to evaluate radiographically the effectiveness of resin infiltration, as an adjunct to standard-of-care preventive measures compared to standard-of-care preventive measures alone, in arresting
the progression of non-adjacent, incipient, proximal enamel lesions in primary molars 24 months after treatment. Methods: The study included a total of 45 healthy five- to eight-year-olds who had been diagnosed radiographically with at least two non-adjacent, incipient, proximal enamel
lesions in primary molars (90 lesions). Test group lesions were treated using resin infiltration followed by five percent topical sodium fluoride (NaF) application versus five percent NaF alone in the control group. The alpha level was set at 0.05. Results: The children were examined
after six, 12, 18, and 24 months. Twenty-five subjects were examined at the 24-month follow-up visit, At which time 10 of the 25 test lesions (40 percent) showed caries progression while 18 of the 25 control lesions (72 percent) showed caries progression (P=0.04). Conclusion: Resin
infiltration as an adjunct to standard-of-care preventive measures is significantly more effective radiographically in reducing the progression of non-adjacent, incipient, proximal enamel lesions in primary molars compared with standard-of-care preventive measures alone after 24 months.