Abstract
Background: A new category system comprising five classes (C1-insufficient material, C2-benign, C3-atypical, C4-suspicious, and C5-malignant) has been proposed by the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) for fine needle aspiration biopsy cytology (FNAB) for proper diagnosis of breast cancer. Aims and Objectives: This study is designed to categorize institutional FNAB data according to the new system and calculation of the absolute risk of malignancy (ROM), sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, false negative and false-positive rate. Study Design: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study involving 2133 cases collected between June, 2008 and August, 2019, at Foundation University Medical College's Department of Histopathology and the Surgery and Oncology Department at the Fauji Foundation Hospital. All cases fulfilling the inclusion and exclusion criteria were retrieved from the archives and reviewed by two expert pathologists. Matching histopathology was compared with the cytology reports for concordance or discordance of results. Findings: We found 6.9% (n = 147) insufficient, 65.8% (n = 1403) benign, 7.2% (n = 153) atypical, 7.5% (n = 160) suspicious and 12.6% (n = 270) malignant cases. Cyto-histological correlation was found in 421 cases from the year 2014 to 2019 with 370 concordant and 51 discordant cases. The maximum number of concordant cases was 151 in the C5 category and discordant cases had a diagnosis of C3 and C4 on cytology with 16 cases in each category. The calculated values of ROM were 45.45%, 10.3%, 30.6%, 82.79% and 99.34% from C1 to C5, respectively. We calculated 83.42% absolute sensitivity and 85.24% specificity. The positive predictive value for category 3, 4 and 5 was 67.34%, 82.7% and 99.34%, respectively, while false-negative rate was 7.9% and false-positive rate was 0.66%. Conclusion: The ROM for C1 category calculated from this study is quite high (45.45%) compared to previous studies; therefore, it is recommended to perform core needle biopsy in all these cases. The higher sensitivity and specificity of this method of diagnosing malignant lesions supports its use.