Abstract
Background
In response to COVID-19, Saudi Arabia as many countries, implemented lockdown" to contain the epidemic. This resulted in suspension of all outpatient services. The reliability of the alternative telecommunication cardiac services during that lime is not well studied. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to describe the structure of the telephone-based cardiac consultation (TBCC) and to explore its outcome.
Methods
This is a cross-sectional study that has a prospective follow up on patients who underwent medical intervention. During the period of lockdown, Alre'aiah health care society in Almadinah Almunawwarah, Saudi Arabia, provided a community health service. This was achieved by announcing telephone numbers for consultations in most specialties. This study includes all TBCC of a single cardiologist. Detailed demographic data, medical, social and drug histories of the patients were collected in charts. Individuals were requested to measure blood pressure (BP) and heart rate (HR) at the time of TBCC. Accordingly, cardiovascular assessment and appropriate intervention were executed. Patients who needed medical intervention were followed up in one week. The data were analyzed using appropriate statistical methods.
Results
From 01 April till 15 June 2020, a total of 168 individuals sought TBCC. Their median age was 51.5 +/- 12.7 years, and (57.1%) were females. Healthy individuals constituted (33.9%), and (59.9%) were non-smokers. The most common reported medical illnesses were hypertension (27.3%), diabetes (23.8%), heart failure (16.1%), and coronary artery disease (14.9%). Palpitations were encountered by 58 patients. None of them had high-risk features or cardiac disease. Stress, excessive smoking, and caffeine intake were thought to be responsible for palpitations in 52 individuals who were reassured and educated, and newly diagnosed hypertension was established prospectively in eight patients and they were started on medications. Chest pain was reported by 51 individuals. The diagnosis of typical angina was made in nine patients and they were instructed to seek emergency care. Atypical angina pain was established in 10 cases who were advised to seek formal consultation once lockdown ends. Reassurance was achieved in 32 individuals who had features of non-angina pain. Uncontrolled hypertension was reported by 32 patients. Blood pressure control was achieved prospectively in 70% of these patients who followed up by adjusting their antihypertensive drugs. Twenty-seven patients with heart failure complained of worsening shortness of breath. New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 1-2 was reported by 21 patients, and they were managed by doubling diuretic dose, 19 of them followed back and reported significant improvement. NYHA class 3-4 was established in 6 patients and they were instructed to seek emergency care.
Conclusions
When standard face-to-face cardiac consultations are compromised, a structured TBCC is considered feasible, seems effective, and promising alternative method of delivering the utmost cardiac care to the community. When conducted properly, it is useful to triage patients.