Abstract
Locoregional flaps, particularly the pedicled lateral forehead flap, are not usually used in reconstructing oral floor defects following oncologic resection. Rather, microscopic free flaps have evolved to be the standard of care in head and neck reconstruction. However, the pedicled lateral forehead flap could be valuable in floor of the mouth reconstruction in the absence of resources or other options.
A-56 years old lady with multiple comorbidities who underwent near total glossectomy, bilateral supraomohyoid neck dissection, and right lateral mandibulotomy due to a locally advanced lingual squamous carcinoma. The last resort was the pedicled lateral forehead flap after many unsuccessful reconstructive attempts utilizing the free anterolateral flap, free radial forearm flap, and pedicled pectoralis major flap.
Decreased donor site morbidity and reliable anatomy are among many of the advantages that made free flaps favorable over locoregional pedicled flaps, especially in oral cavity defects coverage. Of the latter, the pedicled forehead flap, rich in vascularity and neighboring the oropharyngeal defects, could be used with different techniques and modifications. Close monitoring and patient condition optimization is required.
Choosing a particular reconstructive option should be done considering the available resources and expertise and the patient's condition. The pedicled forehead flap remains valuable when other options are inappropriate or have failed.
•Microscopic free flaps are the standard of care in reconstructing oropharyngeal defects.•The pedicled lateral forehead flap was a reliable option until the free flaps became the routine practice.•The pedicled lateral forehead flap remains a valuable option when all other options failed.