Abstract
Formative assessments are an essential yet often overlooked aspect of postgraduate surgical training. This report explores the strategies by which formative assessments are integrated into postgraduate surgical training in Pakistan (using urology as an example), by comparing the regional recommendations and infrastructures offered by local governing bodies to that of a more structured system, as offered by the General Medical Council (GMC). The College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan (CPSP) serves as the de facto local accrediting body for postgraduate surgical training and makes a conscious effort in maintaining the standard of training throughout the country. However, although formative assessment activities are encouraged in its roster, they are rarely monitored as strictly as summative outcomes. This is a far cry from how the structured format is exemplified by the GMC’s various guidelines and protocols. It must be emphasized that in order to improve the overall quality of training, measures need to be made to improve the ways in which feedback and formative activities are implemented and monitored.