Abstract
The purpose of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of different brands of universal dental adhesives used for composite restorations. Four adhesive brands were included: Single-Bond Universal (SB), Tetric N-Bond Universal VivaPen (TN), OptiBond All-In-One (OB), and G-Premio Bond (GP). Adhesives were applied 5 times daily in a standardized class II cavity onto a plastic tooth. A precision-analysis scale was used to measure all of the following parameters before and after use: adhesive bottle, applicator, dosing plate, and plastic tooth. CEA was done by measuring the amount of material utilized/day, waste/day, efficacy, efficiency, average cost-effectiveness ratio (ACER), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's tests with Bonferroni correction at 0.05 significance level. CEA tested parameters were significantly different between groups (p < 0.001) except for ICER (p = 0.112). GP was the least effective (median = 0.062), and SB was the least efficient (median = 0.366). The highest and lowest ACER values were associated with TN (median cost approximate to USD 317) and SB (median cost approximate to USD 317), respectively. ICER analysis reported an incremental cost for extra material utilized per milliliter of approximate to USD 208 for TN, USD 3.8 for GP, and USD -38 for OB, compared to SB. TN seems to be the most efficient and cost-effective dental adhesive.