Abstract
Purpose of Review Urinary diversion (UD) remains the last option for improving quality of life in patients with treatment-refractory urinary incontinence (UI) or voiding dysfunction after cancer treatment. We aim to critically review the utility of UD for UI and voiding dysfunction in patients previously treated for malignancy.
Recent Findings UD patients are at high risk given their oncologic treatment and multiple procedures prior to UD. The severe impact of UI and voiding dysfunction on quality of life is significant. Despite the risk of complications after UD, men reported significant improvement of their urinary symptoms and were confident that they would have sought UD sooner.
Summary UD remains a last option for some men dealing with severe urinary symptoms after treatment of pelvic malignancy in both men and women. Further investigation is needed to better characterize the burden of disease and potential gains surrounding management of these men.