Abstract
•Proper utilization of SPECT may be limited depending on the resources available at each center.•SPECT may not add more localizing information to reinforce the decision for resective surgery in patients with single lesion and congruent clinical, EEG, and MRI findings.•In centers where IEM is not performed, SPECT is unlikely to be helpful in MRI-negative cases.•Careful selection of patients for SPECT imaging can improve its utility and prevent overutilization and potential harm to children.
Single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is an ancillary noninvasive test commonly used to identify the epileptogenic zone. However, its proper utilization may be limited depending on the resources available at each center. This study aimed to investigate the utility of SPECT in presurgical evaluation of children at our center.
This was an observational retrospective study in 150 children who were admitted to the Epilepsy Monitoring Unit for presurgical evaluation between 2012 and 2019. The utility of interictal and ictal SPECT in different clinical cohorts was analyzed.
Only interictal SPECT was performed on 87 patients (58 %), while ictal SPECT was performed on 62 (41.3 %), and interictal SPECT alone was considered of low diagnostic value. Ictal SPECT was unremarkable in 27 of 62 patients and abnormal in 35. Ictal SPECT was localized to the temporal lobe in 62.8 % and to the extratemporal lobe in 25.7 % of the patients and lateralized to one hemisphere in 11.4 % of the patients. In the abnormal SPECT group, ictal SPECT was considered unnecessary in 7/35 (20 %) patients with a single lesion and 3/35 (8.5 %) patients with a hemispheric lesion. In the remaining 25 patients, surgery was recommended more frequently than invasive EEG monitoring (IEM) for diffuse lesion cases (P = 0.03), while IEM was recommended more frequently than surgery for MRI-negative cases (P = 0.03), and in this group none of the MRI-negative patients underwent surgery. In our entire cohort, epilepsy surgery was performed on 24.4 % of the patients, 64 % with a single lesion, 7.6 % with a hemispheric lesion, 25.6 % with a diffuse lesion, and only one MRI-negative patient (2.5 %). Surgery was performed in 48.7 % of single lesion cases and 20.5 % of diffuse lesion cases with either unremarkable or no ictal SPECT. Engel class I outcome was achieved in 62 % and class II outcome in 33 % of the patients. In the single lesion etiology, 72 % (18/25) patients achieved excellent outcome and within this group, 22 % (4/18) patients had a positive ictal SPECT whereas 78 % (14/18) patients either did not get an ictal SPECT or it was unremarkable.
Based on our findings, we suggest carefully selecting patients for SPECT imaging to improve its utility and prevent overutilization and potential harm to children.