Abstract
BackgroundLeft atrial volume (LAVol) is an important predictor of cardiovascular outcomes. Different formulas are applied to calculate LAVol using two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2DTTE) with variable reference values. The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of methods to calculate LAVol by 2DTTE or cardiac computed tomography (CT).
Methods and ResultsOverall 177 consecutive patients who underwent both a 2DTTE and retrospective electrocardiogram (ECG)-gated coronary CT angiography (CTA) within 15days were included for this study. LA volume measurements were calculated by 2DTTE and 2DCT using the biplane area-length, biplane Simpson's, prolate-ellipsoid-1 and prolate-ellipsoid-2 methods. These results were compared with those measured by CT using a volumetric method. There was very good correlation between the CT and echocardiographic measures for LAVol, but significant underestimation of the echocardiographic methods when compared to the reference standard (33.5%, 39.1%, 48.1%, and 53.2% for the biplane area-length, biplane Simpson's, prolate-ellipsoid-1, and prolate-ellipsoid-2 methods, respectively). The biplane area-length method using 2DTTE had the closest volume estimation of all echocardiographic methods to the reference standard (67.625.5mL vs. 106 +/- 35.5mL, r=0.712). Similarly, the biplane area-length method using CT most accurately predicted LAVol (103.3 +/- 36.0mL, r=0.965).
ConclusionsCompared to CT, 2DTTE provides reasonable assessment of LAVol, although all measurement methods underestimate LAVol. For both 2DTTE and CT, the biplane area-length method appears to provide the most accurate 2D estimate of LAVol.