Abstract
This study investigates the role of consumer-brand congruence and consumer-celebrity congruence in the formation of consumer attitudes toward brands and their impact on behavioral intentions within the context of corporate social advocacy (CSA) involving controversial celebrities. Using a U.S. sample drawn from a Qualtrics panel (N = 372), the results of mediation analyses indicate that attitude toward a brand positively mediates the effects of consumer-brand congruence on consumers' behavioral intentions, including purchase intention, brand preference, and boycott recommendation. The consumer-celebrity congruence moderated the indirect effect of consumer-brand congruence on brand preference and boycott recommendations, but not purchase intention. The findings of this study contribute to the CSA literature and practices by highlighting the role of consumers' congruence with a controversial celebrity in determining consumers' behavioral responses to CSA. When brands practice CSA, consumer-brand congruence rather than consumer-celebrity congruence could play a more important role in shaping consumer behaviors.